Iraq: The Consequences of Withdrawal

Iran's supreme leader, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,anyone, Iraqis included, who opposes the formation of
recently told Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki that thean Islamic state. The withdrawal of American troops
best way for him to end the ongoing violence andfrom Iraq would embolden the jihadists, who would
ensure stability and security was to begin thethen take advantage of the power vacuum to
withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Iraq. Khameneipromote Islamic rule similar to that of the Taliban in
was explicit in his desire to see the rapid departure ofAfghanistan.Opposite the parties calling for America to
American soldiers, but the consequences of aleave Iraq are the groups with the most to lose in the
premature U.S. withdrawal would prove to be nothingevent of a withdrawal of U.S. troops.First on this list is
short of catastrophic.There are three basic parties,the current Iraqi unity government. The leaders in
excluding American Democrats, which are activelyBaghdad know that the presence of coalition forces is
pushing for the removal of U.S. and coalition troopsthe only reason the situation in Iraq has not devolved
from Iraq: Iran, the Shiite faction led by radical Iraqi clericinto all-out civil war. Withdrawing American soldiers and
Muqtada al-Sadr, and the foreign jihadists who havetheir allies would leave the Shiite and Sunni death
flocked to Iraq to confront the United States in thesquads free to conduct their sectarian war while a
Global War on Terror.Iran has been making afledgling Iraqi Army stood by unable to stop the
concerted effort to establish itself as the leading statecarnage. In the event of full-fledged sectarian violence,
in the Middle East. In pursuit of this strategic goal,the government in Baghdad would collapse, leaving a
Khamenei and Iranian President Ahmadinejad havevoid that would likely be filled by the Iranians.The
been actively antagonizing the United States over theirsecond group opposed to a U.S. withdrawal is the
nuclear program in order to portray Iran as a nationSunni minority. Yes, it's true that the Sunnis make up
that must be reckoned with. Simultaneously, thethe bulk of the insurgency waging war against coalition
Iranians have used Hezbollah to wage a proxy wartroops. But the Sunnis are fighting for a place in Shiite
against Israel, and the Shiites in southern Iraq to fomentdominated Iraqi society. Waging a ruthless campaign
unrest that threatens the fragile government inagainst the U.S. and Iraqi armies, and against the
Baghdad.The conflict in Lebanon and the increasingcentral government, is the only bargaining chip available
Shiite-Sunni violence are meant to further demonstrateto a group that would surely be targeted for annihilation
to the west that Iran has the ability, and the will, toin a sectarian war. In an odd twist, the Sunnis have to
destabilize the entire region for political gain. With theattack the Americans to make them stay until a
United States out of Iraq, there would be little to stoppolitical accommodation can be reached.Finally, Iraq's
the Iranians from turning Iraq into a satellite state thatneighboring countries are fearful of a powerful Iran,
could help cement Iran's hegemony in the Middlealigned with a Shiite-led Iraq that would threaten Sunni
East.Muqtada al-Sadr has been a thorn in the side ofregimes in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and throughout
the United States since the invasion of Iraq in Marchthe Middle East. While none of these governments like
2003. His Mehdi Army has confronted U.S. and coalitionthe idea of U.S. troops in the region, especially for an
troops in battle and his followers are largely responsibleextended period, the alternative in the form of an
for the Shiite death squads attacking the Sunni minorityIraq-Iran alliance that could dominate the entire Middle
and pushing Iraq closer to all-out civil war. Al-Sadr isEast is even more distasteful.Despite the difficulties
closely aligned with the Shiite leadership in Iran and hebeing faced in Iraq, the United States must see this
has consistently called for the withdrawal of all U.S.fight through to the end. The fragile unity government in
forces from Iraq. The absence of U.S. troops wouldBaghdad must be given a chance to survive on its
allow Al-Sadr's militia to conduct a genocide campaignown.Pulling American troops out now would give the
against the Sunnis while providing Iran with additionaljihadists the victory they have long been searching for,
leverage over the government in Baghdad.Finally,would make America look weak in the eyes of the
Islamic extremists from all over the world haveworld, would thrust Iraq into a bloody civil war, and
traveled to Iraq to join the battle against the Unitedwould create a power vacuum in the Middle East that
States and the west. Al-Qaeda in Iraq and variouswould allow Iran to establish itself as the regional
other fundamentalist groups, while constituting ahegemon. Those are the true consequences of a
minority of the Iraqi insurgency, are determined to takepremature American withdrawal.
advantage of the current chaos to wage war on