Can Nuclear Energy Save You From Global Warming?

Just imagine a world with abundant energy, enablingpeople that manage them, and any further accident will
you to live the good life forever... Isn't that what mostbe one too many. * Modern nuclear power plant
of us crave? Nuclear energy is magic isn't it? Nuclearstructures are much safer. * A terrorist attack, using
energy has no greenhouse gas emissions. The latestradioactive material in a dirty bomb cannot be
technology has made it safe and we can bury nuclearexcluded. * A terrorist attack using an airplane could be
waste without worrying about radiation. Business asdisastrous, even though deactivating a modern nuclear
usual without doing any harm. Perfect! Well, is it?plant can be done in 5 seconds. * A higher-than-normal
Nuclear energy is magical thing. It's hard to understandincidence of childhood leukemia has been reported
how it works and it's easy to get bamboozled bynear powerplants in the UK, France and Germany. *
claims made by the nuclear magicians - scientists - asSo-called Generation IV nuclear reactors, including "fast
well as by opponents. Take veteran environmentalistbreeders" are said to be cleaner (low radiation level
Dr James Lovelock, of GAIA fame who says onlywaste), cheaper and safer but the first will not be
nuclear energy can save us from global warming. Orready before 2010, some not until 2030. Cost *
Dr Helen Caldicott who says it's too dangerous andEconomics of nuclear energy is a wobbly concept,
we do not need it. And governments ... Well, dependsdepending on the assumptions about other energy
on who you talk to. Your life is full already withoutsources and their end costs. * Nuclear reactors
figuring out what is valid and what's not. Right? Easiercurrently have very high start-up and close-down
to just leave it to "Them." But stop! Find out the factscosts compared to other low-emission, and renewable
on nuclear energy and nuclear radiation hazards. Thenenergy sources. * Costs are more than just counting
make up your mind - and next time there is an electionmoney. Comparison to low-emission energy sources *
you vote with some knowledge under your belt. ThereYou'll find many studies with different results. * One
is plenty of information out there to help you make upmust take into account the urgent threat presented by
your mind and I'll give you a leg-up. So, here is an easyglobal warming, that of radioactive energy, and
framework. Imagine experiencing a certainappraise the benefits of energy-wise living and
"knowing"about this important issue on your way to thecurrently available renewable energy sources. The
ballot box, or in talking with your friends. Given thatmagical attraction of nuclear energy remains: throw
global warming is a real threat, and global energyenough money at it and all our problems will seem to
demand is ballooning, then the nuclear energy debate isgo away. But the future is most likely one of a
essentially about four Big Issues. 1) Can nuclear energydiversified use of renewable energy with some nuclear
deliver on a low-emission or even non-emission basis?energy. It's a question of where to put the emphasis.
2) Is nuclear energy for electrical power purposesNuclear energy sources removes people even further
safe? 3) Can it be delivered at a reasonable cost? 4)from tangible "natural" processes. More of the same
How does it compare with other low-emissionkind of thinking that caused our global warming
alternate energy sources? Here is an overview only ofproblems in the first place. Why not emphasize
those issues. But don't just take my word for it. Findresponsible energy use, and the use of the Great Big
out more yourself! Emissions * Yes, nuclear energy isNuclear Reactor In The Sky to drive wind, tidal and
emission-free if you just measure the exhausts from asolar energy. And to try and live in harmonious
reactor's chimney. * In one study, nuclear energy camerelationship with each other and our environments. But
close to wind power in low emissions over its lifetime. *you just have to make up your own mind. My children's
There is no air pollution, with big nuclear energy userfuture and yours depend on you. Only your personal
France having the cleanest air in Europe. * No, it is notattitude - the greatest energy source we know - can
emission-free and is a greenhouse gas emitter, whenhelp you live with global warming. And we are going to
measuring mining of uranium and transporting it, buildinghave to live with it for a long, long time.
and decommissioning nuclear power plants. Safe? *Dr Erik Leipoldt has long been concerned about global
Chernobyl still stands the only disastrous accident withwarming and writes about the alternate energy
a nuclear power plant, and the antiquated structuresources needed to mitigate and live with climate
and action taken after the "melt-down" bears muchchange.
blame. * Any safeguards are only as good as the