Driving On Our Roads - What Does The Future Hold?

Environmental issues have never been higher on theA couple of new road charges have been brought in.
agenda than today and with this has come concertedThe first, to be introduced in Richmond-upon-Thames,
pressure on the motorist. Deemed as one of the mostis that homeowners will be charged a fee to park their
highly polluting sources of pollution, the question hasvehicle outside their homes, the value of the charge
now fallen on how to shift people away from theirdepending on the type of car they own. Residents'
cars. Initiated by the Stern Review, a number ofparking restrictions, initially introduced to help
additional schemes have either been introduced or arehomeowners park outside their homes, are suddenly
currently being planned, leading to the question of whatbeing turned against the very people they were meant
does the future hold for the motorist?to help.
The Stern Review stated one overriding conclusion,The London Congestion charge has already risen to
that the world must act now on climate change or£8 a day from its original £5 a day, and
face devastating consequences. Unfortunately it alsoproposals were unveiled recently to charge so-called
appears that this action is going to lead to devastating"gas-guzzlers" £25 a day to drive into Central
consequences for motorists. Various proposals in theLondon. An extortionate amount by anyone's
Stern Review were suggested, including introducing astandards.
fuel-price stabilizer, meaning when fuel prices they willHowever, something has to be done to protect the
never be able to fall again, and per mile road charging.environment so what's wrong with making a start and
Taking a deeper look into each proposal uncoverspricing polluting motorists and vehicles off the road? It's
fundamental flaws. Artificially setting prices has nevercertainly hard to argue against the fact that some cars
made economic sense and furthermore, the fuel pricedo pollute large amounts of greenhouse gases and
stabilizer would simply have the effect of desensitizingthey should be discouraged. But isn't the real fact to
people from changes in the fuel price. Consider a hugeemerge from all this that the car driver is simply an
rise in fuel prices which subsequently fall but this fall iseasy target? Infrastructure is already in place whereby
not reflected in the price. People become used to thislarge additional taxes can be introduced whilst many
new higher price and when they see that it stays atpeople have little choice but to use their car, meaning
this level for many months they become used to it,that the revenue generated from these taxation
never lowering their consumption, even if fuel pricesschemes will be significant. Even the Stern Review
then begin to gradually rise.undermines its argument against the motorist by
Then there's per mile road charging. As it standsproducing figures showing that transport is responsible
people are charged on a per mile basis - the furtherfor 14% of all the emissions of greenhouse gases in
one drives the more fuel they use and the more theythe UK. Transport that includes car travel, lorries, buses,
pay. Is this not a ploy to generate even more revenuetrains, ships and aircrafts. In addition, the argument is
and prepare for a time when cars no longer run onthat economic growth will suffer if we fail to act now.
fuel? If everyone was to suddenly switch to electricThis simply neglects the effect of imposing huge taxes
cars the government would lose a vital source ofon motorists, seriously inhibiting people's ability to travel
revenue. Per mile road charging could fill in the shortfall,to work and help the economy, and this is all without
brought in under the umbrella of concern for theeven mentioning a certain rapidly growing country -
environment.China.