The advantages of using alternative energies


Electric car progress

Tantalizingly close, but not quite readyPrius, not FPBEVs or plug-in hybrids
for prime time. That's the conclusion of[PHEV], which would travel further on
the latest Independent Expert Panelelectric power, requiring more energy
report to the California Air Resourcesstorage. For PHEVs you need a class of
Board (CARB) on the "Status andNiMH battery that offers both power and
Prospects for Zero Emission Vehicleenergy density. The panel reported that
Technology."while such a battery would cost, in
For the last decade, California hasvolume, between $800-$1200 and give the
relied on experts to advise it on theowner an electric only range of 10-20
progress of electric car technology inmiles, their research turned up no
all its manifestations, fromefforts among manufacturers to develop
battery-only EVs called "Fullsuch a battery, even though the added
Performance Battery Electric Vehicles"cost would more than pay for itself in
or FPBEVs in the report toterms of fuels savings over the life of
hydrogen-fueled vehicles, includingthe vehicle.
those that burn it directly in anThe third class of NiMH battery, the one
internal combustion engine (H2ICVs) andthat has been used for years with
those that rely on fuel cells (FCEVs).surprising durable in vehicles like the
And with each report there has beenToyota RAV4 EV, is the high energy
progress; certainly not a pace thatversion. Here the executive summary
regulators and environmentalists wouldstates...
wish to see, but progress, nonetheless.It is the conclusion of the Panel,
And the 2007 report doesn't break thathowever, that energy density is
pattern. It sees slow, but steadyfundamentally limited and marginal for
progress in battery and fuel cellFPBEV applications, and costs remain as
development, but hurdles remain, bothhigh as or higher than in 2000 and are
technologically and economically.unlikely to decline. High energy NiMH
That assessment is already beingtechnology for possible FPBEV
challenged by electric car advocates whoapplications has not advanced in recent
see its conclusions still undulyyears.
supportive of hydrogen fuel cellElectric car advocates, many of whom
technology, but having reviewed thehave practical, day-to-day experience
13-page executive summary, thatwith this type of battery, argue that we
appraisal seems unwarranted. Indon't have to wait on advances in fuel
summarizing the findings of the panel,cells, hydrogen storage or lithium ion
which included not only evaluations ofchemistry. The Panasonic batteries in
three key "candidate" technologies:their RAV4 EVs clearly demonstrate that
energy storage, hydrogen storage andwe can make use of this battery today,
fuel cells but also interviews with andbut because, some allege, the patents
questionnaires to battery and automobileare held by the unit of a major oil
manufacturers, they concluded that...company, it is being deliberately kept
... at this time no fuel cell developeroff the market. A more likely
has achieved the necessary requirementsexplanation is that the demand for
for automotive fuel cellnickel for use in high-strength steel in
commercialization.China and elsewhere is putting the
Further, on the question of hydrogensqueeze on nickel prices and not oil
storage, they observe.company greed.
Storing sufficient hydrogen on a vehicleThe panel report is much more encouraged
to power it for adequate distance,by the progress in lithium chemistry
safely, and at reasonable cost, withoutdevelopment, stating in the summary, "Li
an excessive weight penalty has been andion batteries are making impressive
remains a serious challenge for thetechnical progress worldwide especially
automobile industry and its suppliers.with regard to calendar life and cycle
...Unlike other major technologies beinglife and safety, the areas of special
pursued in support of ZEVs, hydrogenconcern for automotive applications.
storage technologies have advancedPromising new materials and chemistries
relatively little in recent years.are expanding the capabilities and
So, be it battery energy density orprospects of all Li ion technologies."
hydrogen storage capacity and theHigh power lithium ion batteries are
resultant impact each has on vehicle"close to commercialization" for hybrid
performance and range, in particular,vehicle applications, the panel reports.
ZEV's continue to be perceived, at leastImportantly, for HEV applications Li Ion
by manufacturers and CARB's expert panelbatteries have potentially lower cost
as having limited immediate utility andthan NiMH because they promise to
therefore commercial prospects whendeliver the required power with smaller
compared to fossil fuel alternatives.capacities and lower specific cost.
But all the news isn't bad. WhenAccording to EV World sources, the next
discussing nickel metal hydride highgeneration of Prius, due out probably
power batteries used in today'snow in 2009, will use lithium ion
gasoline-electric hybrids, the panelinstead of NiMH, packing more punch into
sees this technology as being "mature"a lighter, smaller package than is
and that they see the cost coming downpossible with its current battery.
steadily as unit volume increases.But the report is less confident of Li
Today, auto makers like Ford and Toyotaion technology being developed for PHEV
and Honda pay between $2000 and $4000applications, seeing the projected cost
for their NiMH battery packs, but CARB'sof $3500-4000 in mass production being
panel -- on consultation withabove the cost of fuel savings
manufacturers -- see that dropping to(assuming, presumably, the absence of
between $1300 and $2500 in volumes of acarbon taxes or peak oil, either of
million units or more.which could drive the price of gasoline,
But high power NiMH batteries arealong with everything else, much
engineered specifically for the needs ofhigher).
today's gas-electric hybrids like the



1 A B C 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93