A Nuclear Power Plant May Be Next for New Mexico

Federal lawmakers patted themselves on the back,provides energy.The major issue in the western United
last Friday, in a joint bi-partisan news release issued byStates, about nuclear waste, is "please don't put it in
three New Mexico politicians: U.S. Senators Peteour backyard." Several western states have been
Domenici and Jeff Bingaman, and U.S. Congressmanapproached, and even the Carlsbad area was once
Steve Pearce. Their celebratory remarks were meantdiscussed. Through the ABR technology, it may be
to remind voters why the politicians were inpossible to minimize the amount of this waste to make
Washington - to bring their state new jobs for at leastit a less undesirable disposal problem. A look at local
some of New Mexico's voters. While the chorus ofNew Mexico politics may provide an insight as to
praise revolved around creating new jobs and bringingwhere the two U.S. senators may be heading with
millions of dollars into the state's economy, is thereregards to a nuclear power plant for New Mexico.New
more behind this story, which has not yet beenMexico's Enrichment Facility:
told?For Senator Domenici, this was another majorPrelude to a Nuclear Power Plant?If Federal
victory as the longest serving U.S. Senator in Newlawmakers are happy about the proposed uranium
Mexico's history. The Republican Senator heads theenrichment facility, some of New Mexico's state
Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee.politicians were still floating on clouds when we talked
Domenici made his views on nuclear energy quite clearto them yesterday. New Mexico legislator John A.
in his book "A Brighter Tomorrow: Fulfilling the PromiseHeaton, the Democratic representative serving
of Nuclear Energy" (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004). HeCarlsbad, waxed enthusiastic about the enrichment
began pursuing Louisiana Energy Services to move tofacility, "It's the first step in converting this country to
New Mexico in February 2003, after it becamenuclear energy."Mainly the four state senators and
apparent Hartsville, Tennessee didn't want uraniumrepresentatives, whom we interviewed, echoed each
being enriched in their backyard.And again, it wasother's praise about Urenco's proposed enrichment
Domenici, whose last minute negotiations with Energyfacility. "I could not be more pleased," Senator Carroll H.
Secretary Samuel Bodman, led to the adoption of theLeavell told us. "It will have a major, very positive
Part 810 Waiver. The waiver allowed Louisiana Energyimpact on the economy." At the peak of construction,
Services (LES) to contact foreign-owned Urenco Ltdas many as 1200 workers may be employed. Later,
about transferring high technology data (the gaswhen the facility is operational, about 300 workers will
centrifuge technology) to LES so the uraniumremain. All four were pleasantly surprised that town hall
enrichment technology could be utilized at the newhearings for the proposed facility were overwhelmingly
facility. U.S. laws ordinarily prohibit such nuclearpositive, and the local citizens would be delighted to
technology transfers, but Domenici's interventionhave this facility in built in southeastern New Mexico.
brought the project to the NRC approval stage. LESSenator Leavell said with disgust, "Most of the
had been on the drawing boards since 1989, having(anti-nuclear) protests have come from outside our
derived its name from the state of Louisiana. The LESarea, places like San Francisco, DC and Santa
partnership was initially formed with the intent ofFe."Senators Leavell and Gay G. Kernan, the state
building its centrifuge enrichment plant in Homer,senator from Hobbs, were invited by Urenco Ltd. to
Louisiana.Senator Domenici's impact upon the nucleartour an enrichment technology plant in Almelo,
resurgence in the United States is evident to the entireNetherlands and left impressed with the company, its
industry and most politicians. He announced last year,honesty and especially the management's attitude of
"In 1997, I predicted the resurgence of nuclear energy inlooking at both sides of the issues. Both state senators
the United States. For the last eight years, I havealso observed the surrounding community failed to be
worked to help make that renaissance a reality." Isnegatively impacted by the enrichment facility.Looking
there, perhaps, one more achievement Senatorfor deeper insights into what the future might hold, we
Domenici would like to add on behalf of the nuclearasked all four about the possibility of a nuclear power
industry, before giving up his Senate seat? In his book,plant in New Mexico. All four agreed it would be
"A Brighter Tomorrow," Domenici bemoans anddesirable. Additional comments by the four state
condemns nuclear fuel reprocessing. With the adventpoliticians led us to believe there might be a second
of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP),step, following Heaton's remark about the enrichment
Domenici may bring a nuclear power plant to Newfacility being the first step.Donald L. Whitaker, the
Mexico before he retires.Domenici's DemocraticDemocratic legislator from Eunice, the closest town to
counterpart, Senator Jeff Bingaman, is the rankingthe proposed enrichment facility, told us, "I would like to
Democrat on the Senate Energy and Naturalsee a nuclear reactor in New Mexico." Whitaker has
Resource Committee. We suspect Bingaman maytoured a nuclear facility, and believes one would be
play an integral role in helping Senator Domenici fulfillgreat for the state's economy. "They employ about
that dream. Ironically, Senator Bingaman, who lastone thousand and bring high-paying jobs," he said.
November was invited to a Santa Fe anti-nuclearRepresentative Whitaker was not the lone voice
environmentalist fundraiser, and which highlightedamong his fellow eastern New Mexican
television mogul Ted Turner, was effusive in sayinglegislators."Yes, we want a nuclear reactor in New
about the LES enrichment facility, "This will be one ofMexico," Representative Heaton said. Heaton is the
the largest construction projects our state has everlegislature's Vice Chairman of the Radioactive and
seen. And the economic impact in southeastern NewHazardous Materials committee and a member of the
Mexico will be tremendous." Does Bingaman appear toEnergy & Natural Resources Committee. He discussed
be playing both sides of the nuclear chessboard?No,the ABR technology and GNEP, explaining how this
the former attorney, who reportedly once providedwould solve the waste disposal problem of nuclear
legal advice to uranium mining powerhouse, Kerrreactors and sway public opinion on nuclear
McGee, is deftly maneuvering between being a goodenergy.Senator Leavell took a more cautious
Democrat and providing what he may honestly believeapproach, explaining how nuclear reactors need
is best for his state. While Bingaman has curried favortremendous amounts of water. "I don't think New
among the environmentalists, in May of this year, heMexico could have a nuclear reactor, not with the
accepted, along with Domenici and others, the Williamcurrent technology." But, he still agreed it would be a
S. Lee Award for Leadership at the Nuclear Energygood idea if new technologies were developed, which
Institute's (NEI) annual conference, saying, "I share aused less water.Senator Gay Kernan told us, "I don't
belief that nuclear power can make a meaningfulknow if I should be talking about this, but we are one
contribution to controlling the growth of greenhouseof the candidates for the GNEP program." Having
gases, while still allowing our economy to expand." Itheard a rumor that General Atomics may propose
was his subsequent remark directed at the NEI, whichbuilding a nuclear power plant in eastern New Mexico,
leads us to believe he may be among the first toSenator Kernan confirmed such a plant may be on the
support additional nuclear growth in New Mexico. Hedrawing boards, and telling us West Texas is likely to
told the NEI, "I am hoping that you will do your part tobe developed as an "alternative energy corridor." She
use those tools that Congress has put in place totold us, "It would stretch from Carlsbad, New Mexico to
ensure that nuclear power achieves its potential asthe Odessa-Midland, Texas area." Senator Kernan
part of our future energy mix."The Global Nuclearwould also like New Mexico to have a nuclear plant, "I
Energy PartnershipIn March 2006, Senator Domenicidon't have a problem with that."The third politician,
pledged his support to President Bush's Global Nuclearjoining Senators Domenici and Bingaman, in praising the
Energy Partnership (GNEP),"With GNEP, we begin toNRC approval of a draft license for LES and Urenco
close the cycle on nuclear waste in ways that preventLtd, was U.S. Congressman Steve Pearce. Comments,
proliferation and reduce both the volume and toxicityissued by his press secretary on Friday and praising
of waste. By recycling spent nuclear fuel, we canthe LES announcement, may foreshadow New
reuse the uranium, which is 96 percent of spent fuel,Mexico's next step, "Today's announcement marks a
and separate the most toxic radioactive material to bemajor milestone in our efforts to cement our state's
burned in an advanced burner reactor. By reusingleadership role in the development of alternative
uranium fuel and burning the transuranic material in aenergy." What greater leadership by a state than in
new generation of modern reactors, we can reduceintroducing the new GNEP ABR technology in New
the amount of waste placed in Yucca Mountain by aMexico? After all, the state of New Mexico remains
factor of 100."One of the key technologies in thethe founding home to nuclear technology, where the
GNEP program in is the Advanced Burner Reactorworld's first atomic technology was designed at Los
(ABR). Deriving its technology from fast reactors,Alamos.In a related development, David Watts,
which were used to make nuclear weapons, thePresident of the University of Texas of the Permian
concept of the ABR is to minimize the amount ofBasin, recently met with Congressman Pearce about
nuclear waste, produced by the nuclear industry'sdeveloping a helium-cooled nuclear reactor facility,
power plants, to a tiny fraction of content. Thewhich would be built underground in either Lea County,
concept behind the ABR is to "burn" the transuranicNew Mexico or Andrews County, Texas. General
elements, such as plutonium and other long-livingAtomics of San Diego has funded the pre-conceptual
radioactive material. In this case, burning the radioactivedesign, which is underway and scheduled for
waste is translated as: destroying the transuranics, bycompletion in August. Waste Control Specialists has a
converting them into shorter-lived isotopes. When thelow-level radioactive waste storage site in Andrews
transuranic elements are consumed by the ABR, aCounty. Realistically, a nuclear reactor in New Mexico
large amount of energy is released and thenis not out of the question. The legislators may get
converted into electricity.Instead of burying severalwhat they want. We believe Senator Domenici will
football fields of nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain (orultimately set into motion the plans to bring New
elsewhere) for one million years, the toxic wasteMexico its first nuclear power plant. It would become
would be recycled as energy to be immediately usedhis crowning achievement in helping the nuclear
to power homes and industry. Part of the GNEP planrenaissance blossom in this country and in his
is to combine the current, or advanced, light waterstate.James Finch contributes to and other publications.
reactors with the ABR. As the light water nuclearVisit to download your free copy of "Investing in the
reactors produce transuranics, the ABRs consumeGreat Uranium Bull Market: A Practical Investor's Guide
those highly radioactive elements. This leaves lessto Uranium Stocks.
nuclear waste for future disposal, and immediately