Nuclear Energy - The Green Solution

The United States with less than 5% of the world'sthe problem with nuclear energy has been primarily
population consumes roughly 25% of the world'stwo fold. First, the "China Syndrome" problem of a
energy. Some might argue that this is egregious, whilemeltdown of a reactor which could release a large
others would say that it is simply a yardstick by whichamount of radioactivity and second, what do we do
the world's largest economy is measured. But forwith nuclear waste material that has a half-life of over
whatever the reason for our vast consumption of25,000 years! The perception of these two significant
energy, the fact remains that in order to consume youobstacles might doom a new nuclear drive and stand
first have to produce. And as most of our energyin the way of an energy-independent United
comes from burning fossil fuels- which wouldn't be tooStates.However, there are new technologies in this
bad except that:field that, like the cavalry, have come to our rescue-
burning vast amounts of fossil fuels in this countyand none too soon. First, there is a new class of
alone dumps millions of pounds of earth warmingnuclear reactors that have their nuclear fuel so
greenhouse gasses into, what appears, is a fragilestructured that they cannot do a melt down. Turn off
atmosphere, every day. Just warming up thethe cooling to this new nuclear reactor and it only gets
atmosphere a couple of degrees on average hasa bit hotter. No big deal. Turn the cooling back on and it
significant impact. Look no further than last year'sruns more efficiently. Okay, one down. But what about
hurricane season. The worst on record. And...let's notall that radioactive spent reactor fuel? Let's see if we
forget its close cousin; smog pollution, which adds tocan put some perspective on it. If you gathered all the
respiratory problems and other health conditions, not tospent nuclear fuel in this country under one roof it
mention the visual blight hanging over our cities as well.would fill a typical high school gym. Not too
In addition...have you filled your tank recently? Paid theunmanageable. Moreover, the spent fuel is
heating bill? The cost of all fossil fuels, even coal hasencapsulated in super strong glass beads, which in turn
increased significantly. As other emerging economiesare embedded into hardened concrete inside steel
such as China and India vie for ever more limiteddrums. This makes the waste product "transportable"
resources, all bets are that the costs will continue toand is designed to withstand the elements for 10,000
climb over the long haul. Moreover...as we import mostyears. Nevertheless, even in it's tomb it is still relativity
of our oil nowadays- we are increasingly held hostageradioactive. Most of these drums are stored in water
to an unstable supply from a number of countries thatas radiation cannot penetrate more than about 3 feet
we, for whatever reasons, are increasingly unpopularof water. However, no one seems anxious to have it
with. The end game? If our supply of oil is not firstin their back yards. A political hot potato to be sure.But
arbitrarily cut off, as it becomes increasingly scarce thewhile our politicians don't have the answer, the earth
price will rise until our growth is strangled. In either casedoes. The answer lies in the bottom of the Marianas
we will feel impelled to engage in war with other risingTrench in the Pacific. It is the deepest place in the
powers to secure our supplies.ocean (over seven miles) and one of the fastest
moving subduction plates on earth. If the drums of
The bottom line: Fossil fuels are not only hazardous towaste were placed in the bottom of the trench, they
our health (and the planet's) but may in fact bewould, within a few hundred years, be swallowed up
hazardous to the American way of life.But if energy isinto the bowels of the earth and blend into the earth's
the lifeblood of our economy what are we to do?core where heat and pressure (caused in part by
Wind? Solar? While anything we can do other thanradioactive substances contained within the earth)
consume fossil fuels will help, these sources of energyrendered insignificant.Given the current geopolitical
are relatively diffuse and inconsistent. In other words,situation, which only seems to be working to our
their "cost to calorie" ratios are not efficient and theydisadvantage, limited resources for cheap fossil fuels,
are not always dependable. As James Kunstler pointsnot to mention the environmental impacts we are
out in his intriguing book The Long Emergency, one ofstarting to experience, it is time we take drastic
our best options out of these dilemmas is to do anmeasures to get us off our fossil fuel addition. Let's
"Apollo Project" type effort to develop additional, newhope we are not too late.John Woolf is the founder of
nuclear energy capability. As it turns out, it just may beseveral successful Internet technology companies
the greenest, viable alternate we have.The U.S.including the Book Price Comparison website As a
currently produces about 20% of its electrical powerpragmatist of the world around him, he is both a critic
from nuclear power. The advantages are; that thereand crusader on international politics and energy policy
are no greenhouse emissions into the atmosphere, noas it relates to our security and our impact on the
visual pollution, it is cost relatively cost effective, quietglobal environment.Visit to read reviews, find similar
and we have sufficient supply of uranium here attitles, and search for the lowest possible price for The
home for the foreseeable future to provide for aLong Emergency and other great books.
major portion of our energy needs. Historically, at least,