Institutional Theory and Definitions About Natural Resources

Why institutions matter to achieving economic anddepartment of mines, a geological survey, a mineral
social development is certainly not a question that haspromotion agency and an environmental office.
arisen only in the context of mineral-rich countries.While the earlier theoretical literature underlined formal
Social scientists have long pointed to institutions as wellinstitutions, such as legal systems, property rights and
as institutional change to explain economic and socialcontracts, the more recent conceptual work has
transformations. This emphasis has been revived bystressed the importance of informal institutions and
recent institutional theorists with backgrounds inhow they relate to formal institutions.Reforms
disciplines as diverse as sociology, comparative history,re-assigning property rights have not considered that
political science and economics.property rights are social constructs and so in order to
Diversity in conceptual thinking on the relationshipbe stable and secure they require legitimacy.Thus, the
between institutions and economic and socialtheoretical policy arguments would appear to shift
outcomes is reflected in the fact that there is not justaway from pointing to the existence of a particular
one definition of what institutions actually are. Institutionslaws or policies on paper and move towards
are the rules of the game in a society or... are theemphasizing the importance of the joint perception of
humanly devised constraints that shape humaneconomic, political and social actors that particular laws
interaction. More recent theoretical developments haveor policies are appropriate and legitimate.
defined institutions at an even more abstract level.ForThere clearly is a disjuncture between the theoretical
example consider them to represent a system ofclaims and practical policy advice. The ideas that have
social factors that conjointly generate a regularity ofguided the theoretical debate are not pinned to
behavior.particular claims regarding specific types of institutions.
Stocktaking of recent theoretical contributions confirmsBut the diversity of definitions and theoretical concepts
that it is at the higher order levels where the study ofmay have lent itself to practical policy advice latching
institutions still requires more attention. This includesonto particular types of tangible formal institutions to
questions such as how institutions are embedded inmake these the target of reforms. Examples include
societies, how power relations are to be interpretedmodel laws, regulations, organizational set-ups and
and how the bureaucratic functions of government areeven software solutions in sectors as diverse as
to be understood? The related governance debatenatural resource management, transport, public finance
emphasizes the rules of the political game and aand public administration. The challenge is that
country capacity to implement and enforce publictransplanting formalized types of institutions across
policies and to improve public sector coordination withdiverse countries has failed to produce consistent
the private sector.outcomes. While this result does not point to the
Theoretical work has linked the importance ofcomplete failure of the conventional reform approach,
institutions for development to a range of differentit places the success factors outside the remit of
micro-economic functions, such as overcomingconventional policy advice.
collective action problems, eliminating uncertainty in theOn the observation that many poorly performing
context of bounded rationality and reducing transactioncountries are autocratic it was tested the often
costs. It has been argued that if it was not for therepeated proposition that democratization helps
existence of institutions, the problems underlying theseresource-rich countries to manage resource wealth
functions would undermine the pursuit of productivebetter. They draw a distinction between democracy
economic activities. For example, institutions can take aas an electoral process and a strong system of
coordinating function by encouraging productivechecks and balances.
behavior, including learning and innovations, or they canIn turn, a strong system of checks and balances does
prevent actions that would otherwise undermine socialnot necessarily require a democratic electoral process.
cohesion and evoke distributional conflicts.Those autocracies that have performed well in
Policy-practitioners in turn have often referred to goodeconomic terms have been found to uphold strong
institutions as particular types of organizations orsystems of checks and balances preventing
policies, for example a particular type of trade regime,unproductive rent-seeking and the inefficient use of
independent central banks, semi-autonomous agenciespublic resources. This finding suggests that rather than
that provide a particular type of public services orfocusing on regime type, more emphasis should be
standardized tools for public financial management.placed on how political-administrative systems work,
Policy recommendations for the mining sector in theand what checks and balances they provide across
early 1990s emphasized the creation of five institutionsthe public sector and between the public sector and
with specific roles, including a ministry of mines, asociety.