Palm oil, Deforestation and Global Warming: Junk Theory

This is a true story. In a riveting and astonishing tell-allcent of its global production."
book called appropriately "Confessions of anIn my view, therein lies the root of the problem. Either
Economic Hit Man", John Perkins recounts his lifedeliberately or inadvertently, no effort has been made
story working inadvertently as an "Economic Hitto distinguish between Malaysian palm oil and
Man".Indonesian palm oil. Just because Malaysia and
A bright young graduate from Boston University'sIndonesia are collectively accountable for 83% of the
College of Business Administration, the impressionableworld output in palm oil, does not mean that both
Perkins served in the American Peace Corps incountries adopts the same conservation and cultivation
Ecuador in September 1968. Following that stint Perkinspolicies.
was recruited by Chas. T. Main Inc (MAIN), anFor one, the adorable Orang Utan is the Malaysian
international consulting firm that was in charge ofnational animal mascot. The orang utan thus holds a
studies to determine whether the World Bank shouldspecial place in every Malaysian heart and
lend developing countries billions of dollars to buildconservation efforts are vigorously pursued. For
infrastructure projects.another, how can the UN report have a shred of
What followed was a dizzying rise up the echelons ofcredibility when Malaysia, despite its tiny land mass still
an organization that was, in effect an agency to overretains, up to now, close to 70% forest cover, and has
prescribe development infrastructure for developingbeen doing so for quite a number of decades. This has
countries - projects that were deliberatelybeen so, despite rapid growth in the Malaysian palm oil
over-budgeted and over-designed. The real objective,industry and industrialization for the past fifty years.
that was unbeknownst to Perkins then, was that byWe have to ask, just how is it even remotely possible
convincing these developing countries such asfor 98% of the Malaysian rainforest to be destroyed
Indonesia, Panama, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Colombiaby 2022 when 70% has been preserved for the past
to accept enormous loans from the World Bank, these5 decades?
developing countries would be saddled with huge andDue to the stringent enforcement of The
insurmountable debts and be forever beholden to theEnvironmental Quality Act, and effective planning on
United States. Massive funds flow into the coffers ofland use, the expansion of Malaysian palm oil
US corporations and the American government couldproduction has come about through better R&D
then extract their "pound of flesh" includingand the replanting of superior palm oil clones on
access to military cooperation, natural resources andexisting palm oil land, agricultural land or previously
political support. The story takes on such riveting andlogged over areas. For an august body like the UN to
yet terrifying dimensions with tales of fraudulentinsinuate that 98% of the forest cover in BOTH
financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs rivaling theMalaysia and Indonesia will be destroyed by the year
darkest espionage thriller. Perkins names names and2022, is thoughtless, irresponsible and foolhardy, to say
connect the dots in telling his bone chilling story of thethe least! The UN will have to do some soul searching
nasty, manipulative and plainly evil practices carried outto rein in the reckless elements within their organization
in the name of empire.(i)and to come up with guidelines to prevent this august
Considering the concerted action against palm oil, webody from being manipulated by opportunist NGO's
have to wonder whether there is more going onsuch as the Friends of the Earth (FOE)!
beneath the surface than meets the eye. NGO's suchIt would not be remiss, to query as to the reasons for
as CSPI, FOE, Wetlands and others have, for somethis organized and concerted action against palm oil by
time now, been doing a hatchet job against palm oil. Inthese so-called environmental NGO's like the FOE. A
the light of the revelations by conscientious and bravehint as to the real reason lies in an article written by
people like Perkins, it behooves us to question whetherRhett A Butler entitled: "Why is oil palm replacing
these NGO's have been doing it inadvertently in thetropical rainforests? Why are biofuels fueling
name of true conviction or as active agents in thedeforestation?" published on April 25th, 2006. In
interest of empire?the article, Butler offers a clue for the virulent attacks
For instance, Marcel Silvius, a so-called climate expertagainst palm oil, viz: "The answer lies in the crop's
at Wetlands International in the Netherlands, inunparalleled productivity." He goes on to
ostensibly comparing "the benefits of palm oil tounwittingly give the real motive away: "Simply put,
the ecological disaster from wiping out virgin Asian rainpalm oil is the most productive oil seed in the world. A
forests to grow lucrative new plantations," allegessingle hectare of oil palm may yield 5,000 kg of crude
that "the cultivation of the palm trees was foundoil or nearly 6,000 litres, according to data from
to unleash far more carbon dioxide than will be savedJourneytoForever." Then, the confessional:
by oil's burning.""For comparison, soybeans and corn - crops
The report went on to argue that the carbon releasedoften heralded as top biofuel sources - generate only
from peat swamps in Indonesia and Malaysia that had446 and 172 litres per hectare, respectively!" (ii)
been drained and burnt to make place for the palm oilIsn't it time for the media and right minded individuals
trees was causing global warming. The report wouldand institutions such as the UN to wake up to this
be hilarious if it were totally implausible. However, theinsidious and vile misuse of the environmental agenda
devious and deliberately Machiavellian aspect of theagainst an innocent crop.
report is that it seeks to paint Malaysian and IndonesianLet's now examine whether the contention that
palm oil with the same brush. Anyone conversant withdeforestation is leading to global warming which in turn
the industry will know that Malaysian palm oilis leading to extreme weather conditions around the
plantations are rarely planted on peat swamps as theworld can stand up to the scrutiny of available data.
trees prefer sandy and well drained soils and MalaysiaNumerous studies have shown that there is no
just does not indulge in slash and burn practices thatincrease in extreme weather. In fact, in a 1996 study
are so popular in Indonesia (perhaps because ofby Nicholls Landsea, et al, this group of geophysicists
Indonesia's larger land mass), to clear virgin jungle .found strong evidence that there was a distinct
Palm oil is attractive as it is relatively abundant, cheap,downward trend for the last fifty years in the extreme
and needs few or no changes to already existingweather in the Atlantic. (iii) This was borne out in
power stations.another study in 1997 by Henderson-Sellers, et al in a
Unlike fossil fuels, it was considered that the carbonpost IPCC assessment of tropical cyclones and global
emitted from palm oil's burning is equal to thatclimate change. This group of weather scientists again
absorbed during its growth. As a vegetable oil palm oilfound no evidence of any such increase. (iv)
can enhance a healthy diet, and as a biofuel it canAccording to the United Nations Intergovernmental
reduce carbon emissions.Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a detailed
Yet, in a recent UN's environment programme report,examination of meteorological data fails to support the
'The Last Stand of the Orang Utan: State ofperception of increased frequency and severity of
Emergency', a report bordering on the ludicrous, saysextreme climate events, in the context of a long term
natural rainforests of Indonesia and Malaysia are beingclimate change. In a 2001 IPCC Report, the UN Panel
cleared so rapidly that up to 98 per cent may bereported "no long term trends" were
destroyed by 2022, and the lowland forest strongholdsevident for tropical and subtropical storms as well as
of orang utans much sooner, unless urgent action isno systematic changes in the "frequency of
taken. This, the report alleges is a full decade earliertornadoes, thunder days or hail (v) The data confirms
than the previous report estimated when it wasthat US Hurricane strikes over the last hundred years
published five years ago. Overall, the report goes on toare clearly not increasing. (vi) It is therefore clear that
contend, the loss of orang utan habitat is happening 30extreme weather is not more frequent globally - the
per cent more rapidly than had previously beendata simply does not bear that out and in fact,
thought.disproves it!
Quickly jumping on the bandwagon, the Borneo OrangIt is easy to understand why environmental NGO's love
Utan Survival Foundation UK, a charity which works tothis theory of global warming so much. Everytime
rescue, rehabilitate and release the animals intothese NGO's run a campaign on pollution, for instance,
protected forest, warned that at the alleged currenttheir cash register rings. It rings because pollution
rate of deforestation by the palm oil industry, orangscares the hell out of people. Tell people that they'd
utans in the wild could be close to extinction by 2012.get cancer and the money rolls in!
The UN also highlights the supposed growing threatHowever, these environmental NGO's like the FOE and
posed by palm oil harvesting, noting that large areas ofTreehugger have bitten off more than they can chew,
Indonesian and Malaysian forest have been cleared towith global warming. For one, there is too little scientific
make way for plantations. Says the Report: "Asevidence to back the theory and an abundance of
consumer awareness about healthy eating and ethicaldata proving that the theory is false, probably
shopping grows, palm oil is an increasingly popularmotivated more by financial skullduggery than solid
alternative to trans fatty acids - more closelyscience. To make matters worse for the NGO's, data
associated with heart disease - and is found in one inpainstakingly collected for over a century disproves
10 supermarket products including margarine, bakedand discredits their theory.
goods and sweets, as well as detergents andIn the view of the Palm Oil truth Foundation, it's about
lipsticks."time that the media wakes up to this fact, and not
The UN Report continues: "There has been muchallow themselves to be manipulated by these
soul searching among environmentalists because palmirresponsible NGO's. For that matter, every time it
oil is also in demand for biofuels, seen as one of thesnows or the mercury hits a new low, any right thinking
best ways of reducing dependence on fossil fuels andhuman being would and should question this junk
so combating global warming. Palm oil is currentlytheory on global warming! After all, the proof of the
considered the most productive source of biodieselpudding is in the eating!
fuel, and Indonesia and Malaysia account for 83 per