The Role of Economic Resources in the Marital Adjustment of Women

INTRODUCTION1036
             Marital harmony is the globallyLow Income
important social phenomenon, which plays vital role in 
our life. Successful marital relationship based on many95
factors but economic resources are considered to be45.38
most essential.   Various studies have been14
conducted on this issue   Behnke & Mcdermind,Medium  Income
(2004) studied economic factor in relation to family 
well-being e.g Voyandoff (1990) studied economic62
distress and family relations.  Ross & Mirowsky41.64
(1992) and Yadollahi (2009) studied that employment of15
spouses  and the sense of control in various types ofHigh Income
stressors of marital life. Diener and Diener (2001) 
investigated  that wealth is related to many positive43
outcomes in life.  Jorgensen & Butler (2010)33.69
reported various ethical issues among the couples with11.75
reference to their psychological conflicts other thanTable 4 shows one-way analysis of variance
economic.(ANOVA) of the sample data of 200 women, their
              Many researchers haveincome is divided into low, medium and as well as high
concluded the negative effects of economic hardshipincome. It shows the significant difference among three
on marital quality and stability (e.g. Voydanoff, 1990;groups (f=10.36;df=199;p<0.001).
Oggins, 2003; Miller et al., 2003).   Gudmunson et al 
(2007) found, economic strain is directly linked toDiscussion
increase  couple disagreements.  Kerkmann,           Present study aimed at to explore
Thomas, Jean, & Scot's study (as cited in Pimentelthe relationship between marital adjustment and
2009) reported that financial problems significantlyeconomic resources.  It was hypothesized that the
contributed to lower reported marital satisfactionworkingwomen have better economic resources as
among married couples. Economic strain is directlycompared to non-working women. Moreover, the
linked to increased couple disagreements and hasstudy also investigated the difference between marital
direct impact on marital adjustment (Kinnunen andadjustment of working and non-working women.
Feldt, 2004).All these findings are likely to reflect theResults support the hypothesis.
fact that financial issues are a frequent trigger point for           The results of a t-test reveals that
conflict  among the couples led to more frequentsignificant differences exists between the economic
fights and decrease in marital harmony (Gudmunson etresources of working and non-working women
al., 2007). Study performed by Brody et al (1994) has(t=9.645; df =198; p<0.001). Mean score of working
proved that family income was associated with higherand non-working women are differ as mean score of
marital happiness and lower marital conflict. Similarly,working women on economic resources was
the study by Amato & Rogers (1997)M=33.3(SD=11.4) and mean score of non-working
demonstrated that a low husband's income andwomen was M=49.9(SD=12.7). Thus workingwomen
employment factor is a significantly associated withhave better economic resources to fulfill their
marital problems and low marital quality and itrequirements. It reduces their life stresses and intern
increases the likelihood of marital disruption (South andeffects  their marital happiness and satisfaction. It
Spitz, 1986). Looking the research findings it isconcludes that  workingwomen are to more satisfied
reasonable to hypothesized that financial satisfactionand martially adjusted as compared to non-working
and marital satisfaction is directly correlated (Miller'swomen. Study also concludes that workingwomen
study as cited in Frisby, 2007). Recent study by Nunes,have better economic resources because both
(2008) also proves that   marital satisfaction is mainlyhusband and wife earn more money as compared to
associated with economic factor.non-working women. Study confirms the finding of
             In a recent Mori survey, 35Ayub & Iqbal ( 2009) who concluded that;
percent of women and 26 percent of men agreed people with higher income felt happier, more satisfied
that the economic downturn had "reduced the qualityand adjusted with their lives,  have a better lifestyle
of their marriage" (Government Equalities Office, 2009).through greater leisure opportunities improved nutritional
Another study supported the relationship betweenintake, better access to health services and improved
finances and marital satisfaction by identifying that 15%living environment through better housing. Present
of marital satisfaction was predicted by financialstudy showed significant relationship between finance
factors (Kerkmann, Thomas,Lown, &Allgoodand happily married relationships which resembles to
,2000). Survey conducted by Frisby (2007) also showsthe study of Washburn, Carolyn., & Christensen
that family income affect the degree of marital(2008). 
satisfaction.              Working and non-working
            Researchers sought to define andwomen responded differently on the sub scale of
identify causal relationships between economic stresseconomic resources of MAS-U. The high score on the
and relationships between husband and wife andscale showed that the subject has some economic
parent and child. James( 2009)proposed a "familyproblems. In this research score of workingwomen on
stress model" in which economic pressures causeeconomic resources was low that indicates they have
adults emotional distress, which disrupts both theless economic problems and thus more martially
marital relationship and parenting. Marshall andadjusted.  Score of non-working women was high
colleagues (1997); Zedlewski (2002); Behnke &that reveals they are facing stress due to economic
Mcdermind (2004)  found that low family income andand consequently enjoying less marital happiness. On
limited benefits not only have bad effect on mutualthe other hand low marital adjustment of non working
relations of couples but it also has negative influenceswomen proposed that economic hardships and decline
on child and family well-being. Jacobs & Silverberbin marital satisfaction are mediated through economic
(2002) found Maternal disclosure of financial concernspressure, which produces emotional distress and
is related to difficulties in adolescent daughters'negative marital interaction patterns. Conger  (1990) 
adjustment and such disclosure acts as a mediator inalso supported the  results. The economic pressure is
the relationship between family financial hardship andrelated to the emotional distress husbands and wives
adolescent daughters' adjustment in a sample of 62felt, which, in turn, gave rise to more negatively and
adolescent girls and their recently divorced mothers.conflict in the marital relationship. Present findings
              The association betweenanalogous to Grant &  Barling's(1992) study that
economic stress, individual psychological state andLower income  associated with poorer marital
relationship quality may not be the same for all couples.functioning  and increases family violence (Straus
However, for couples that were observed to have& Gelles, 1986).  Bloom, Niles & Tatcher,
better problem-solving skills in a task, high levels of1985; Godwin, 1990; Israelen, 1990; Nortarius &
marital conflict did not lead to such high levels of maritalMarkman's study (1993) confirmed that financial
dissatisfaction (James, 2009). Blekesaune (2008) usedmatters are closely related to family discord, marital
the data from the British Household Panel Surveyproblems.  
between 1991 and 2005 and found that low income              Another hypothesis of this
increased the risk of partnership dissolution. Similarstudy that the "workingwomen are more martially
study In Finland conducted by Kinnunen and Feldtadjusted as compared to non-working women" was
(2004) concluded husband's unemployment is stronglyproved. The non-working women obtained high score
associated with his marital adjustment. Financial stresson marital adjustment scale as compared to working
is not, of course, confined to times of recession, but iswomen. It shows that their adjustment with their
a continual feature of life for some families. However,husbands is not good (t=6.381;df=198;p<0.001), Table 3.
in a recession, this is spread more widely (James,It reveals the significant difference between the marital
2009).adjustment of working and non-working women.
            Conger (1990) proposed thatThese two groups are also differ in their mean score
economic hardships and declines in marital satisfactionas mean score of workingwomen was 247.0
are mediated through economic pressure, which(SD=27.2) and the mean score of non-working women
produces emotional distress and negative maritalwas 272.9 (SD=30.2). So, due to better economic
interaction patterns. Economic hardships engenderedresources working women are martially adjusted and
feelings of economic pressure. This pressure wasnonworking women are martially mal-adjusted.
related to the emotional distress husbands and wivesMaladjustment of non-working women is due to low
felt which, consequently, gave rise to more negativelyeconomic resources that is similar to Elder (1974) who
and conflict in the marital relationship.concluded that economic hard times increased rate of
  Grant &  Barling (1992) has reported thatmartial distress and results also conform Blekesaune's
economic factors are responsible increases violence (2008) study. Present findings coincide with Brody et
within family (Straus & Gelles, 1986; Obradovical (1994) who proved that family income was
& Odradovic, (2006). associated with higher marital happiness and lower
            Evidence has suggested thatmarital conflict.
people with higher income felt happier, more satisfied            One way of variance (ANOVA)
and adjusted with their lives because higher incomewas applied on data to find-out the impact of
could be used to have a better lifestyle througheconomic resources. The whole sample was divided in
greater leisure opportunities and improved nutritionalto three groups that were belong to low, middle and
intake, fewer uncertainties, better access to healthhigher socio-economic status. Table 4 indicates the
services and improved living environment throughresult of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and
better housing and the ability to move to places thatshows the significant difference among three groups
are more prosperous (Ayub,,& Iqbal, 2009). Social(f=10.30;df=199;p<0.001). It shows that the subjects
stress research has repeatedly identified low incomewho belongs to low-income level (M=45.38;SD=14.11)
and income loss as a major social stressor (Elder,have to face more economic problems as compared
1974). Much of the marital researches done beforeto other groups. The result also reveals that the
1980 identified financial problems as one of the primarysubject who belongs to middle-income level
reasons for couple's marital dissatisfaction and(M=41.64;SD=15.10) and higher-income level
dissolution (Albrecht, 1979; Levinger, 1976). However,(M=33.69;SD=11.75) have enough economic resources
although finances remain a potentially problematic issueto fulfill their needs. The findings by other researches
for couples, but later studies suggest that financialalso confirmed that low income can cause distress in
problems may be less influential than previouslylife as Marshal and colleagues (1997) and financial
believed (Andersen, 2000; Kitson & Sussman,issues within the family or marriages are frequently
1982; Thurnher, Fennnn, Melichar, & Chiriboga, 1983;reported as a presenting problem. (Daly, 2003; Isareisen
Amato & Rogers, 1997) thus inflating the& Hatch, 2005 cited in Jorgensen & Butler
perceived importance of financial distress as predictor2010),low family income has negative influence on
for marital dissolution (Kendal, 2003 cited in Dean, et al family well-being( Zedlewski,2002).
2005). Money is one of the major causes of frustrationConclusion
in marriage and family relationships; there is a significantThe main hypothesis of this study was to explore the
relationship between finance and happily marriedeffect of economic resources on marital adjustment.
relationships. In a study conducted by the ConsumerThe present study has identified that working married
Credit Counseling Service of people who came to thewomen have better economic resources as
organization for debt or budget counseling, 60 percentcompared to non-working women. Despite of their
of the married respondents reported fighting aboutbusy routine life they are more martially adjusted as
money with their spouses. (Washburn,Carolyn.,&compared to non-working.
Christensen2008).It is concluded that money/income creates the
            Marriages stressed by economicproblems in daily life activities and it can effects one's
uncertainties have also been more likely to bemarital adjustment as it is proved in this research.
disrupted (South and Spitz, 1986). Dean (2005)Couples with better economic resources are martially
explored possible linkages between financial problemsadjusted as compared to those who have limited
and divorce and marital conflict. Many studies has  economic resources. Well-adjusted partners tend to
concluded  that  couples facing more financialbe more supportive to each other and encounter
obstacles and spending less time together are more atfewer quarrels.
risk for divorce (Poortman 2005; Cleek &
Pearson, 1985).  Sayer concluded that  , the transition 
to divorce is associated with economic stressors forReferences
most women (as cited  in Craig & Behnke ,2008).Albrecht, S. L. (1979). Correlates of marital happiness
 Research Methodologyamong the remarried. Journal of Marriage and the
  Research designFamily, 41, 862. Retrieved from http:// www.
          Main focus of this study was to findinformaworld.com/index/904729005.pdf
the effect of economic resources on maritalAmato, P. R., Rogers, S.J. (1997). A longitudinal study of
adjustment.  It has been hypothesized that bettermarital problems and Subsequent divorce. Journal of
economic resources lead to better marital life andmarriage and family, 59,612-624.    Retrieved from
resultantly improves the quality of marital adjustment. In Andersen, J. D. (2000). Financial problems as
this study, economic resources and marital adjustmentpredictors of divorce. Journal of Marital and  Family
were used as independent and dependent variablesTherapy, 3,53 -60. doi:10.1111/1752-0606.1977. 004 85.
respectively. The effect of economic resources onAyub, N., & Iqbal, Z. (2009, November 20).
marital adjustment was investigated by making theIncome-related behavior. The news. Retrieved from
comparison between married women from nuclearthe news/nov 009-weekly/busrev. 29.06/p7.htm
family system and joint family system which is also anBehnke, A., & MacDermind, A. (2004). Family
important source of conflicts among the spouses inwell-being. Encyclopedia. Retrieved on Nov 4, 2009
Pakistan.  The research design for the present studyfrom . php?id=235
was quantitative, where as cross sectional researchBeutler, I.F., & Mason,J.W.(1987). Family cash-flow
design was employed to compare and investigate thebudgeting. Family and Consumer Sciences Research
data. This study was carried out in to three phases. InJournal, 16, 3-12.doi: 10.1177/1077727x870/ 600/01
first phase, two types of married women wereBlekesaune, A. (2008). How work affects divorce: The
categorized, one, working women and the secondmediating role of financial           and time
non-working women (i.e. housewives). At the secondpressures. Journal of Family Issues, 26,168-195.
stage, personal data was collected with the help ofRetrieved from    
"bio-data form" i.e. monthly income, family system. AtBloom, B.L., Niles, R. L., & Tatcher, A.M. (1985).
the third phase sample was selected and data wasSources of marital dissatisfaction         among
collected through survey from Abbottabad city from anewly separated persons. Journal of Family Issues, 6,
sample of 200 married women selected on a simple359-373. Retrieved from    jfi.sagepub.com/cgi
random technique. The first simple of 100 workingcontent/refs/274s/359
women was drawn, which was further divided into;Cleek, M. G. & Pearson, T. A. (1985). Perceived
living in nuclear family (n=60) and living in    jointcauses of divorce: An analysis of interrelationships.
family system (n=40). The second sample of 100 nonJournal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 179-183.
-working women was drawn which was equallyRetrieved from
divided in   nuclear family system and joint familyCraig, L. D., & Behnke, A. O. (2008). Financial
system.management strategies for women         in
Research Instrumentdivorce transition. The Forum for Family and Consumer
             In the present study ‘subIssues, 13(2). Retrieved from
scales ‘Economic' and ‘General pattern ofDean, L. R., Carroll, J.S., & Yang, C. (2005).
adjustment' of Marital Adjustment Scale-Urdu (MAS-U)Materialism, perceived financial      problems, and
(Kazmi , 2002) was used for data collection. MAS-U ismarital satisfaction. Family and Consumer Sciences
an attempt to establish a framework from whichResearch Journal,        35, 260-281. doi: 10.1177
marital adjustment can be estimated in Pakistani1077727X06296625
culture by the researcher and practitioner. MAS-U wasDiener, E., & Diener, B.R. (2002). Will money
designed and intended to measure marital adjustmentincrease subjective well-being? Social Indicator
in Pakistani culture.  All other marital scales are inResearch, 57,119-169.Retrieved from Intention
English language and their cultural adaptation is quitealhappiness. com/articles/july-2009/Money-Happiness-
laborious phenomenon. The MAS-U is a standardizedElder. (1974). Stress-Effects of economic stressors on
instrument in Urdu language and thus is able to evokemarital behaviors. Retrieved from ors-
real response from the interviewees.   MAS-U is aon-Marital-Behaviors.html
reliable instrument the determine the degree of (1)Esere, M. O. (2000). Communication management skills
Spouses interpersonal frustration and dissatisfactiontraining as a marriage enrichment program in the
which quit common in our culture,  even rationalimprovement of marital adjustment. Retrieved on Oct
reasons elicits or not; (2) Spouse's capability to23, 2009, from /publications/esere/ communication. 
express their feelings on various issues; (3) Spouses'Kazmi,S.F.(2002).Marital adjustment of educated career
satisfaction within available economic resources andwomen and educated non career women. Unpublished
their style of non vocal communication ; (4) Spouse'smanuscript, Humdard Institute of Social Sciences,
specific communication style about the routine maritalKarachi, Pakistan.
life issues; (5) Women's  satisfaction within existingKinnunen, U., & Feldt, (2004). Economic stress and
family systems their approach towards familymarital adjustment among couples: Analyses at the
systems common in   Pakistan. The MAS-Udyadic level. European Journal of Social Psychology
consisted of 126 items that loaded on four factors.34(5),519-532.Retrieved from 85159/abstract? 
Participants marked their responses on a Likert scaleFrisby, F.(2007). Does household income affect the
ranging from 1 to 5 (Strongly agree, Agree, Undecided,degree of marital satisfaction? Retrieved December
Disagree, Strongly disagree). The internal consistency3,2009,from fire/ 
of MAS-U has been reported with a Cronbach alphaGodwin, D. D. (1990). Family financial management.
of 0.82. Along with some evidence of construct validityFamily Relations, 39, 221-  228. Retrieved from
was also determined.  Whereas, for theGovernment Equalities Office (2009). The economic
‘Economic' Cranach alpha is 0.9 and fordownturn – the concerns and experiences of
‘General pattern of adjustment' it is 0.82.women and families. Retrieved from
 Grant, S., & Barling, J. (1992). Linking unemployment
             Procedure of the study:experiences, depressive symptoms and marital
                To collect data for thefunctioning: A Mediating Model. Retrieved  December
present study 200 married women were selected in3,2009, from /jbarling/Chapters/linking.pdf
which 100 were working married women and 100Grable,J.E., Britt,S.,& Cantrell,J.(2007). An
were non-working married women. The Maritalexploratory study of the role financial satisfaction has
Adjustment Scale was administered personally by theon the thought of subsequent divorce. Family and
researcher in face to face fashion. Purpose of studyConsumer Sciences Research
was explained to each participant that the researchJournal,36(2),130-150.doi:10.1177 /1077727Xo7309284
was the part of thesis work and the information theyGudmunson. C, et al. (2007). Linking financial strain to
given will be remained confidential and only uses formarital instability: examining the roles of emotional
research purpose. The respondents were asked todistress and marital interaction.  Journal of Family and
response as strongly agree, agree, undecided, disagreeEconomic Issues, 28(3), 357-376.Retrieved from article/
and strongly disagree. In the present study, to explorekapjfamec /default28.htm
the economic resources of working and non-workingHernandez, D.J. (1993). America's children: resources
women, income was taken into consideration.from family, Government and the economy. A census
Husband's income was also used while measuring themonograph series. Retrieved from ERICWebPortal
economic status. For measuring the economiccuston/portals/recordDetails/ detailmin.jsp
resources of workingwomen income of husband andIsraelsen, C. L. (1990). Family resource management
wife both were used. While measuring the economicresearch: 1930-1990.  Financial Counseling and
resources on non-working women only husband'sPlanning, 1, 3-37. Retrieved from www. Emeraldinsight
incomes were used.viewcintentservlet/filename/published
 Analysis and interpretation of the resultsemeraldfulltextArticle/ Article/0070301201.html
              After the data collection, theJames, C. (2009). What do we know about the impact
next step was the interpretation of the data. First, theof recessions on family relationship? Retrieved from
item was assigned the score of one to five for thehttp//: tore/ Documents/research/Recession
positive statements and the reversed scoring wasJacobs, L.S., & Silverberb, K.S. (2002).Family
used for the items having negative tone. Then thefinancial hardship and adolescent girls'' adjustment: the
statistical analysis was applied on data. T-test androle of maternal disclosure of financial concerns.
one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were appliedMerrill-palmer quarterly. 48(1), 1-24.doi:10.1353
on data to assess the significance of the results. Totalmpq.2003.0003
marital adjustment score of the MAS-U ranged fromJorgensen, B. L., & Butler. (2010). Ethical
195 to 300 with mean of 247 (SD=27.2) forconsiderations of MFTs treating client Financial
workingwomen and 211 to 348 with mean of 272.9problems. Public Knowledge Journal, 1(2), 137-148.
(SD=30.24) for non-workingwomen. The score onRetrieved from                
economic resources ranged from 16 to 65 with meanKerkmann, B. C.,Thomas, R. L.,Lown, J.M., &Allgood
of 33.38(SD=11.4) for workingwomen and 18 to 70 with,S. M. (2000). Financial      Management, Financial
mean of 49.9(SD=12.75) for non-workingwomen.Problems and Marital Satisfaction. Financial counseling
Responses to questionnaire items were coded and    and planning,  11 (2), 55-65.Retrieved from
enter in computer. The statistical analysis wasfspublishers. org/ijab/past-issues/IJABVOL_2_ No _4
carried-out by using SPSS . 19 .pdf
Table 1Kitson, G. C. & Sussman, M. B. (1982) Marital
Number of itemscomplaints, demographic character ristics and
Msymptoms of mental distress in divorce. Journal of
 Marriage and the Family, 44, 87-101.  Retrieved from
Sdjstor.org  /pss/ 351265
 Kwon, H., Rueter, M. A., Lee, M., Koh, S. & Ok, S.
Cronbach  AlphaW. (2003), Maritalrelationships following the Korean
 economic crisis: Applying the family stress model.
16Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65, 316-325.doi
      75.0 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00316.x
 Levinger (1976). A social psychological perspective on
13.5marital dissolution. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 21-47.
      0.82Retrieved from /journal/119631050/abstract , 6,423-435.
 doi: 10.1080/016502 50143000364
  Marshall, N. L., colleagues, C. G., Marx, F., McCartney, K.,
The relaiability statistic for the self–constructedKeefe, N., & Ruh, J. (1997). After-school time and
Marital Adjustment Scale show cronbach,s Alpha tochildren's behavioral adjustment. Merrill-Palmer
be reliable at .82Quarterly, 43, 497-514.retrieved from articles
  Mean, Variance, standard Deviation, and Cronbach'smi_qa3749/is_199707/ ai_n8780256/
Alpha computed for the communication in MaritalMiller, R. B.et al.(2003). Problems that couples bring to
Adjustment (n=200)therapy. A view across The Family life cycle. The
  American Journal of Family Therapy,31,395- 407.
Table 2 Mean, Standard Deviation and t-score ofRetrieved from  P1 T2.Pdf
working and non-working women on economicNotarius, C., & Markman, H. (1993). We can work it
resources.out. Retrieved from  
 Nunes, A. (2008). Marital problems and marital
Working    Women    n=100satisfaction: An examination of a Brazillian sample.
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â   Retrieved from 4.pdf
Non-working Women  n=100Obradoviae, M. E., & Obradoviae, J. (2006). Marital
 partners'income as a determinant of marriage quality.
 MJournal for General Social Issues, 2(1), 117-139.
 SD      Retrieved from
 Â Â Â Â Oggins,J.(2003).Topics of  marital disagreement
 M     among African-American and Euro-American
 newlyweds. Psychological Reports, 92,412-425.
 SD Retrieved  from
 tPoortman.A.R. (2005). How works affects divorce:
Economic Resources         The mediating role of finance and time pressures.
 Journal of family issues ,26(2),168-195.doi: 10.1177/
 33.38        0192513X04270228
         11.45           Pimental, M., Roobb, C., & Houser, R. (2009) Money
 and Marriage: An exploration of the relationship
 49.9             between Marital status and money attitudes among
12.75                     couples. Retrieved from 09Pimentel.pdf
 Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (1992). Households,
9.645employment, and the sense of control. Social
Table 2 shows the t-test values and analysis of thePsychology Quarterly, 55, 217-235. Retrieved from
sample data of 200 women and their economicjstor.org/pss/2786793
resources. It indicates the difference between theSouth., & Spize.(1986).Stress-Effects of economic
economic resources of working and non-workingstressors on marital behaviors. Retrieved from
women. It shows that there is significant difference-Stressors- on-Marital-Behaviors.html
between the economic resources of working andSolantaus, T., Leinonen, J. and Punamäki, R. (2004)
non-working women (t=9.645; df= 198;p=0.001)Children's mental health in times of economic recession:
 Replication and extension of the family economic
Table 3 Mean, Standard Deviation and t-score ofstress model in Finland. Developmental Psychology
working and non-working women on marital40(3), 412-429.Retrieved from
adjustment.Straus., & Gelles.(1986).  Societal changes and
 changes in family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48
 .112-115.Retrieved from . org /know/ societal/529change
Working    Women    n=10020Summary.pdf
 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â   Thurnher, M. et al (1983). Sociodemgraphic
Non-working Women  n=100perspectives on reasons for divorce.      Journal
 of Divorce, 6 (4), 25-35.Retrieved from
 M.                          com
 Â index/9033 80 688.pdf
 M  Turkel, A. R. (1988).Money as a mirror of marriage.
 Journal of American academy of psychoanalysis,
 SD t16,525-535. Retrieved from document.
Marital adjustment      php?id.jaa.016.05259
 247.0            Voyandoff. (1990). Economic distress and family
27.2            relations: A review of the eighties. Journal of Marriage
272.9             and Family, 52, 1099-1115. Retrieved from /stable
30.24          353321
6.381Ward, P.J., Lundberg, N.R., Zabriskie, R.B., Berrett, K.
Table 3 shows the t-test values and analysis of the(2009).Measuring marital            
sample data of 200 women and their maritalsatisfaction: A comparison of the revised Dyadic
adjustment. It indicates the marital adjustment ofAdjustment Scale and the    Satisfaction with
working and non-working women. It shows that thereMarried Life Scale. Marriage and Family Review, 459
is significant difference between the marital adjustment(4),412-            429.doi:10.1080\
of working and non-working women (t=6.381; df= 198;01494920902828219
p=0.001) Washburn, C., & Christensen, D. (2008).Financial
 harmony: A key component of successful marriage
 relationship. The Forum for Family and Consumer
Table 4  significant difference among maritalIssues, 13 (1). Retrieved from
adjustment of women with respect to low mediumWhite, L. & Rogers, S. (2000). Economic
and higher income.circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the
Groups1990s. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62,
 1035-1051. Retrieved from D11 15 10
NYadollahi, M, et al. (2009). Factors affecting economic
Meanstatus. European Journal of Scientific Research,
SDf37,99-109. Retrieved from journals.com/ejsr_37_1_ 12
Total Sample.pdf
 Zedlewski, S. R. (2002). Family economic resources in
200the post-reform era. Future of Children, 12, 121-145.
41.7Retrieved from das/journal/view/0/N/12370589?
14.6